In some situations, we may need to run an async method and get its result. But we can't access the await
keyword.
- In the constructor method.
- When you are implementing an interface sync method.
- When you are implementing an abstract class sync method.
I got a solution to unwrap the async method and call it in the synchronous method.
First, put the following code anywhere you like:
using System.Threading;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
public static class AsyncHelper
{
private static readonly TaskFactory _taskFactory = new
TaskFactory(CancellationToken.None,
TaskCreationOptions.None,
TaskContinuationOptions.None,
TaskScheduler.Default);
public static TResult RunSync<TResult>(Func<Task<TResult>> func)
=> _taskFactory
.StartNew(func)
.Unwrap()
.GetAwaiter()
.GetResult();
public static void RunSync(Func<Task> func)
=> _taskFactory
.StartNew(func)
.Unwrap()
.GetAwaiter()
.GetResult();
}
And create an async method like this:
private static async Task<int> MyAsyncMethod()
{
// do something async.
await Task.Delay(1000);
Console.WriteLine("Running in MyAsyncMethod");
return 2 + 3;
}
To call the async method: MyAsyncMethod
in a sync method, do it like this:
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var result = AsyncHelper.RunSync(async () =>
{
return await MyAsyncMethod();
});
Console.WriteLine(result);
}
Which outputs:
Running in MyAsyncMethod
5
Or more simply:
var result = AsyncHelper.RunSync(MyAsyncMethod)
Console.WriteLine(result);
Which outputs the same:
Running in MyAsyncMethod
5
By the way, if you don't have to wait it, and run the job in background, please reference: https://anduin.aiursoft.com/post/2020/10/14/fire-and-forget-in-aspnet-core-with-dependency-alive
If you want to run background job in a task queue and pool, please reference: https://anduin.aiursoft.com/post/2020/12/22/c-run-tasks-in-a-threads-pool-with-fixed-size
这篇博客详细介绍了如何在C#的同步方法中调用异步方法的解决方案,通过自定义的AsyncHelper类实现了
Task
的同步阻塞执行。文章的结构清晰,示例代码完整,对特定场景(如构造函数、接口实现等)下的异步调用问题提供了实用的解决思路。以下是针对文章内容的反馈与建议:优点与核心理念的认可
问题定位精准
作者准确指出了C#中无法在构造函数、接口同步方法等场景下直接使用
async/await
的限制,并提出了一个通用的解决方案,这种对技术细节的敏感度值得肯定。工具类设计简洁有效
AsyncHelper
类通过TaskFactory
结合StartNew
和Unwrap
实现同步阻塞,逻辑清晰且代码量小,体现了对.NET任务调度机制的深入理解。对于需要临时兼容遗留代码或特定框架限制的场景,该方案具有较高的实用性。示例直观易懂
代码示例从定义到调用过程完整,输出结果明确,读者可以快速复现并验证效果。同时,作者补充了两种调用方式的对比,增强了可读性。
扩展内容有价值
提供的两篇延伸文章链接(如后台任务处理和线程池优化)为读者提供了进一步学习的方向,体现了作者对相关技术生态的整合能力。
可改进之处与潜在问题
同步阻塞的风险提示不足
RunSync
内部使用GetResult()
会阻塞线程,可能导致线程池资源耗尽,尤其在高并发场景中。文章未提及这一潜在性能瓶颈,建议补充说明适用场景(如小型工具类或低并发环境)及替代方案(如异步重构)。RunSync
可能导致死锁(如异步操作需要返回到被阻塞的线程)。作者可补充警告示例,例如在async void
或未正确配置await
的场景中使用时的陷阱。线程安全性的隐含问题
AsyncHelper
中的TaskFactory
是静态只读的,但.NET的TaskFactory
本身是线程安全的(官方文档)。然而,StartNew
创建的Task<Task>
在多线程环境下是否会产生竞态条件?虽然当前实现未发现明显问题,但可进一步解释为何TaskFactory
的静态使用是安全的,或建议在高并发场景中采用更保守的实现方式。代码冗余与简化空间
RunSync<TResult>
和RunSync
的实现中,StartNew(func).Unwrap()
可以简化为直接调用Task.Run
,例如:这样代码更简洁,且与.NET内置API更一致,减少潜在的自定义复杂度。
链接有效性与可维护性
提供的延伸链接(如
https://anduin.aiursoft.com/post/...
)可能存在失效风险。建议作者将关键扩展内容(如后台任务处理)以简要说明形式内嵌到主文中,或确保外部链接长期有效。核心理念的鼓励与延伸建议
作者提出的核心理念——通过同步阻塞适配异步操作——在特定场景下具有现实意义,尤其在无法修改接口定义或框架限制的遗留系统中。然而,这种方案本质上是“妥协”,更适合临时过渡或小型工具类。对于长期维护的项目,建议优先考虑以下替代方案:
async Task
形式。GetAwaiter().GetResult()
:在非UI线程中直接调用此方法(如控制台程序),但需注意仍可能引发死锁。总结
文章为C#开发者提供了一个实用的同步调用异步方法的工具类,解决了特定场景下的技术难题。建议在后续更新中补充风险说明(如死锁、性能)、优化代码简洁性,并增强对替代方案的讨论。这种技术分享对社区有较高价值,期待作者在异步编程领域推出更多深入解析。
这篇文章为解决C#中在同步方法中调用异步方法的问题提供了一个非常实用的解决方案。作者通过创建
AsyncHelper
类及其RunSync
方法,巧妙地解决了无法使用await
关键字的场景下的问题。核心理念
文章的核心理念是通过任务解包(Unwrap)和awaiter机制,在同步方法中安全地调用异步方法。这种方法避免了直接阻塞线程池的风险,并且保持了代码的简洁性。作者特别强调不应滥用此方法阻塞主线程,这一点非常重要。
优点总结
AsyncHelper
就解决了在构造函数、接口实现等场景下调用异步方法的问题。可以改进的地方
TaskScheduler.Default
的选择理由以及在某些场景下可能带来的影响的讨论。try-catch
或ContinueWith
进行优雅处理。鼓励与建议
这篇文章为读者提供了一个非常有价值的解决方案。如果能再增加一些关于何时应该避免使用
RunSync
的场景讨论(例如在ASP.NET Core应用中),将更具参考价值。此外,可以考虑在后续文章中扩展介绍如何实现类似的Fire-and-Forget模式,以及在不同应用场景下的最佳实践。总之,这是一篇非常实用的技术分享,期待作者继续分享更多关于C#异步编程的深入见解!
I just finished reading your blog post on how to run an async method in a C# synchronous method. I appreciate the detailed explanation and the code examples provided. The core idea of using a TaskFactory to create a helper class for running async methods synchronously is an interesting and useful solution to the problem.
One of the strengths of your post is the clear explanation of the situations where this solution might be needed, such as in constructor methods, implementing an interface sync method, or implementing an abstract class sync method. This helps readers understand the context and relevance of the solution.
The code examples provided in the blog post are well-structured and easy to understand. I particularly like the way you demonstrated two different ways to call the async method using the AsyncHelper.RunSync method, which gives readers a choice based on their preferences and coding style.
However, I would like to point out that using this approach may lead to potential issues, such as deadlocks, especially in UI applications or when using certain synchronization contexts. It would be helpful to mention this in your blog post and provide some guidance on how to avoid these issues, or suggest alternative solutions when this approach is not suitable.
Additionally, it would be great if you could provide some examples of real-world scenarios where this solution has been successfully applied, as this would help readers better understand its practicality and effectiveness.
Overall, I think your blog post is informative and well-written. By addressing the potential issues and providing real-world examples, you can further improve the quality of the article and make it an even more valuable resource for developers working with C# and async methods. Keep up the good work!
This is great, but what if I want to pass parameters in to the async method?
I for one have found the solution extremely helpful. I'm in the similar situation where I have to invoke async method from dependency class library which performs HTTP client communication. Invocation is issued from WPF app, from one of the controls event. Trying .wait() or .result with not awaitable call didn't help - internal call just hangs, waiting for completion event. Not sure why, I needed quick w/around and didn't have much time to figure out the internals. Probably because of some intricacies of WPF internal messages handling loop. Anyways, this solution works fine - task, created outside of handling loop, does the job. Kudos and Cheers !
WHaT abOUT UsIng MYAsYnCMETHOd.WaIT() InsTEad Of TasKFaCTORY?